Feeders focus on the high-quality
beef that leads to a brighter future.
Opportunities hide within every challenge, but beef producers
can find them through analysis and planning. That was part of
the take-home message at the Feeding Quality Forums, Nov. 10 in
South Sioux City, Neb., and Nov. 12 in Garden City, Kan.
“While domestic demand struggles,
tremendous economic growth in Asia points to market potential
for high-quality U.S. beef,” said Dan Basse, president of the
Chicago-based AgResource Company, who reprised his 2007 role as
lead speaker.
The fourth annual sessions were
sponsored by Pfizer Animal Health, Certified Angus Beef LLC
(CAB), Feedlot magazine and Land O’ Lakes Purina Feed LLC. More
than 150 cattle feeders and allied professionals attended.
Beef exports represent just 7%
of production, compared to pork and poultry each around 19%,
Basse told them. “If U.S. beef could get that export share up to
14%, it could add $9 to $13 per hundredweight (cwt.) to cattle
prices.”
He suggested devoting some beef
checkoff funds to building global demand. “You will need to
broaden your base to generate more income and finance feed
purchases in the volatile grain markets,” Basse said. In the
short term, demand from a recovering ethanol industry will help
support an upward trend in corn prices, he added.
Mark McCully, CAB assistant vice
president for supply, pointed out reasons for the recent
increase in beef quality grades and highlighted the greater
demand for Certified Angus Beef ® brand product that makes it a
more rewarding and stable target than simply USDA Choice.
One measure of that demand can
be seen in CAB international sales. At 10% of the company’s 663
million pounds (lb.) in 2009, the ratio outpaces exports of all
U.S. beef.
McCully agreed that global
markets hold a key to the future and noted there are few
obstacles to greater supply.
“We keep finding more areas
where the high-quality beef target coincides with making a
profit,” he said. “Producers just have to understand their own
cost-value relationships that govern the purchase of feeder
calves, use of technology and marketing strategies.”
Genomics, or DNA marker-assisted
selection of cattle, holds greater promise to adding more
quality and profit potential, according to Mark Allan and Kent
Andersen of Pfizer Animal Genetics.
The charted markers for various traits have increased from just
seven in 2004 to 54,000 today.
That lets seedstock producers
make decisions earlier to focus on promising lines, and plans
for “marker-assisted management” will open this world to
commercial cow-calf, stocker and feedlot operators, Allan and
Andersen said.
Making the most of genetic
potential requires focused nutrition, said Ron Scott, director
of beef research for Purina Mills. He reviewed data on health
and weather factors relating to performance and grade before
settling into a discussion of feeding strategies.
The ideal balance of grains,
vitamins and minerals optimizes beef quality and producer
profitability. Scott presented details on industry research into
distillers’ byproducts and the most effective feeding levels,
generally from 12% to 25%.
However, finishing diets mainly
just fill the marbling cells determined much earlier in life.
Recent research has concluded that nutritional marbling starts
with fetal programming, especially in the third trimester, Scott
said.
“It’s based on the concept of
epigenics, that the environment can cause genes to behave
differently,” he explained. “Studies of Holocaust survivors and
their offspring prove such changes are permanent and can be
passed on to future generations.”
Beef cows are “the most
nutritionally challenged” of livestock, seemingly by design. “We
plan for them to lose weight during the winter,” Scott noted,
countering, “What if we cared for the cow herd like we do
pregnant women?”
In a closing presentation Alex
Avery, director of research for the Hudson Institute, suggested
“the tide is about to turn” in both the real and figurative
“Food Wars.”
Fear of hunger has fueled war
for centuries, but Avery focused on the war of ideas about how
food should be produced, considering that demand for it will
more than double in the next 40 years. It could triple if living
standards keep trending higher.
All that added demand won’t come
just from the growth in population, which should peak at 8.25
billion in 2050, but mainly from growth in disposable income in
Asia, he said.
Echoing comments from Basse,
Avery said the beef industry should not look to U.S. demand for
its future base, because domestic demand for meat has stagnated
to the point of “social debates that elevate myth over science.”
Among the myths he works to
dispel are global warming, organic utopia and the supposed
unsustainable nature of large-scale farming.
“Corn-fed beef and dairy are the
most planet-friendly products we can have,” Avery said.
“Unfortunately, some research is ignored by mainstream media and
even government organizations. Pandering to perceptions
justifies their budgets.”
Author of “The Truth About
Organic Foods,” Avery challenged producers to engage the media
by adding “planet-friendly” claims to all packaged fresh beef.
“That will force them to face facts, even though it’s a debate
they don’t want to have,” he said.
|